Most challenging Old Earth evidence.

This the next part in may series on Evidence for Young Earth Creation. This part deals with the most challenging Old Earth evidence that is the evidence that that is used to claim an old Earth that have posed the biggest challenges for Young Earth Creationist. This does not mean they are unanswered but they have been the hardest to deal with. What follows is the list of topics that I plan on dealing with here. I would also like any suggestions you will have. They will be considered for inclusion as long as I get the suggestion before I conclude this part.

 

Top List

 

Distant Star light.

Radiometric dating.

Carbon 14 Dating.

The 4.5 Billion year age given for the Earth,

Craters.

The fossil record.

The Geologic Time scale.

Sedimentology.

 

By the way I know that Radiometric dating, Carbon 14 Dating, and the 4.5 Billion years all deal with Radiometric dating but Carbon 14 Dating, and the 4.5 Billion year are specialized areas that need special treatment.

 

As I said feel free to make suggestions. The most likely reason why I may not include it is if I think it is best included under “Alleged Old Earth evidence easily dealt with.”

 

Analysis of Kepler-186f

http://gscim.com/phy/Thermodynamics/Statistical_Thermodynamics.html

 

The discovery of Kepler-186f announcement of an Earth size planet inside its star's habitable zone produced excitement as well as speculation about life existing on this plane and possibly intelligent life. Also followed were the usual artist depictions of the planet making it look similar to Earth. However an actual analysis of Kepler-186f shows that all it really has in common with the Earth that it is similarity in size with Earth.

 

 Despite  the atheistic evolutionary presupposition  that Kepler-186f might be habitable, there is no  evidence that ithas even a drop liquid water, and even if it did that is not evidence for life. However behind the repeated desperate hopefulness of finding life on one of these exoplanets is the theory abiogenesis a theory of biological origins that is thermodynamically impossible. Abiogenesis is the theory that life arose spontaneously for non living chemicals. The thermodynamic impossibility of abiogenesis results from statistical thermodynamics and not from the 2nd law. However the desperation for atheists to explain how we got here without God requires them assume that life arose spontaneously for non living chemicals no mater how much the laws of physics say it can't happen.

 

 

Neanderthals as smart as modern man

http://www.newser.com/story/186220/modern-humans-no-brainier-than-neanderthals.html

 

While Evolutionists have tented to depict Neanderthals as intellectually inferior brutes, Creationists have been saying that they were at least as intelligent as we are.

 

Now Evolutionists looking for support for the intellectually inferior brutes idea have shown that Neanderthals were at least as intelligent as modern man.

 

Now while they would never admit it, these Evolutionists have shown the Creationists have been right on the intelligents of Neanderthals all along.  

 

So once again creationist models of the past have made a successful prediction, while the Evolutionist has missed it.

 

 

------ Charles Creager Jr.

Genesis Science Mission

Online Store

Genesis Mission

Creation Science Talk

 

 

---

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.